Ensuring Quality Care in the COVID-19 Era: Applying the Donabedian Model to Tertiary Wound Care Center Practices.

The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted healthcare, with its far-reaching effects seeping into chronic disease evaluation and treatment. Our tertiary wound care center was specially designed to deliver the highest quality care to wounded patients. Pre-pandemic, we were able to ensure rapid treatment via validated protocols delivered by a co-localized multidisciplinary team within the hospital setting. The pandemic has disrupted our model's framework, and we have worked to adapt our workflow without sacrificing quality of care. Using the modified Donabedian model of quality assessment, we present an analysis of pre- and intra-pandemic characteristics of our center. In this way, we hope other providers can use this framework for identifying evolving problems within their practice so that quality care can continue to be delivered to all patients.

Virtual Subinternships in the COVID Era: Lessons Learned from Three Institutional Experiences.

After the cessation of all in-person visiting rotations during the coronavirus 2019 pandemic, many programs developed virtual rotations as an alternative for the recruitment and education of prospective applicants. In this study, we developed a consortium of three institutions each with a unique virtual subinternship and prospectively surveyed participating students in order to reflect and improve upon future rotations. All students participating in virtual subinternships at three institutions were administered the same pre subinternship and post subinternship electronic surveys. Subinternship curricula were developed independently at each respective institution. Fifty-two students completed both surveys, for an overall response rate of 77.6%. Students' primary objectives were to evaluate their fit with the program (94.2%), interact with residents (94.2%), gain faculty mentorship (88.5%), and improve didactic knowledge (82.7%). Postrotation surveys revealed that over 73% of students reported having met all of these objectives over the course of the rotation. On average, students ranked programs 5% higher overall after the rotation (P = 0.024). Postrotation results showed that the majority (71.2%) of students perceived the virtual subinternship as slightly less valuable than in-person subinternships but that all students would participate in a virtual subinternship again. Student objectives can be successfully met using the virtual format for subinternships. The virtual format is also effective in enhancing the overall perception of a program and its residents. Although students still prefer in-person subinternships, our results suggest that virtual rotations are more accessible and very capable of meeting student goals.

COVID-19 Vaccination Status and Capsular Contracture Following Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction: A Retrospective, Multicenter Nested Case-Control Study.

BACKGROUND: Capsular contracture (CC) is a common long-term complication following prosthetic-based breast reconstruction (PBBR). Seven cases of CC following mRNA vaccination for coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) are reported in the literature. OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether receiving the COVID-19 vaccine was associated with CC development following PBBR. METHODS: A retrospective, multicenter nested case-control study was performed from January 2014-July 2022 of adult female patients who underwent PBBR with acellular dermal matrix placement. Cases of CC were selected if no adjuvant radiation was received and they presented for follow-up between December of 2020-July 2022. Controls included patients who met inclusion criteria but who did not experience CC in either breast. Patient demographics, breast cancer characteristics, reconstructive surgery details, postoperative complications, and COVID-19 exposure details were analyzed and correlated with CC development. RESULTS: Of a total of 230 patients (393 breasts) who received PBBR, 85 patients (135 breasts) met inclusion criteria; of which, 12 patients (19 breasts) developed CC and 73 patients (116 breasts) did not. At the time of median follow up of 18.1 months (n = 85, IQR: 12.2, 33.6), we observed no statistically significant differences between the short- or long-term complications in cases or controls. There were no significant differences in COVID-19 vaccination status, number of vaccine doses, or vaccination type between cases and controls. Vaccination status was not associated with greater odds of CC development (Odds Ratio: 1.44, 95% Confidence Interval: 0.42 to 5.37, p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Direct association between CC and COVID-19 vaccination is difficult to prove. Given the known risk of severe COVID-19 infection among immunocompromised patients, those with breast cancer who undergo PBBR should be properly counseled on the benefits and risks of vaccination.

Intensive care unit versus floor admission following lower extremity free flap surgery: Is there a difference in outcomes?

BACKGROUND: Free tissue transfer (FTT) lower limb salvage requires costly multidisciplinary care. Traditionally, patients who undergo FTT reconstruction for lower extremity (LE) wounds were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) in the immediate postoperative period for close monitoring. During the COVID-19 pandemic, our practice shifted toward admitting FTT patients to the floor postoperatively instead of the ICU. The purpose of this study is to compare surgical outcomes in patients admitted to the floor versus ICU immediately following LE free flap reconstruction. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing LE FTT reconstruction from 2011 to 2021. Flap monitoring consisted of an implantable Cook-Swartz Doppler probe for muscle flaps and ViOptix tissue oximetry for fasciocutaneous flaps; clinical exam and hand-held dopplers were not the primary flap monitoring techniques. Patients were divided into two groups depending on whether they went to the ICU or floor postoperatively. To ensure proper comparability between cohorts, we corrected for age, BMI and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) using 1:2 propensity score matching (floor: ICU). Primary outcomes included early postoperative complications, flap takeback and salvage, flap success, and postoperative length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: A total of 252 patients were identified. Forty-five patients (17.9%) were admitted to the floor postoperatively and 207 patients (82.1%) to the ICU. Overall, microsurgical success rate was 97.2%, which was similar for floor and ICU patients. Flap takeback and salvage were similar between cohorts. Average postoperative LOS was significantly shorter in floor patients (15.7 vs. 19.1 days, p = 0.043). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that postoperative floor admission does not decrease flap success rates and should be considered in patients who undergo FTT to LE reconstruction and are otherwise stable. In the ongoing era of health care cost containment, microsurgery centers should consider appropriate floor training to allow medically stable free flap patients to avoid an ICU stay.

Telemedicine in the Wake of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Increasing Access to Surgical Care.

The COVID-19 pandemic has brought seismic shifts in healthcare delivery. The objective of this study was to examine the impact of telemedicine in the disadvantaged population. METHODS: All consecutive patients with outpatient appointments amongst 5 providers in the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department between March 2, 2020, and April 10, 2020, were retrospectively reviewed. Appointment and patient characteristics collected include visit modality, reason for visit, new or established patient, history of recorded procedure, age, sex, race, insurance provider, urban/rural designation of residence, Social Vulnerability Index, and income. The primary outcome of interest was whether or not a patient missed their appointment (show versus no-show). RESULTS: During the study period, there were a total of 784 patient appointments. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, patients with a higher Social Vulnerability Index were more likely to have a no-show appointment (0.49 versus 0.39, P = 0.007). Multivariate regression modeling showed that every 0.1 increase in Social Vulnerability Index results in 1.32 greater odds of loss to follow-up (P = 0.045). These associations no longer held true after the lockdown. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates a reduction in disparity and an increase in access following the dramatically increased use of telemedicine in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. Although drawbacks to telemedicine exist and remain to be addressed, the vast majority of literature points to an overwhelming benefit-both for patient experience and outcomes-of utilizing telemedicine. Future studies should focus on improving access, reducing technological barriers, and policy reform to improve the spread of telemedicine.